SpaceX Is Public. Now What?

SpaceX debuted on the Nasdaq on June 12 under the ticker SPCX. It priced at $135, opened at $150, and closed its first day at $160.95. Five days later it’s trading around $202, roughly a 50% move which pushed the market cap to roughly $2.65 trillion, just past Amazon. It was the largest IPO in history. The $75 billion raise was more than two times oversubscribed, and even the 30% retail allocation was fully exhausted before pricing closed.

A friend of mine recently described buying SpaceX as like buying stock in the Mayflower. You’re investing in the vessel that opens up an entirely new frontier. We like the analogy. It captures the ambitious nature of the space economy. But it cuts both ways: most early colonial ventures went bankrupt, and the payoff was generational, not for the original investors. So the question with SPCX is whether you’re buying the company or the narrative. We think the answer matters a lot at this price.

Starlink 

The value of SpaceX starts with Starlink. It’s a genuine threat to the entire communications industry. 8.5 million subscribers, over $10 billion in projected revenue, and roughly 90% of global space-based internet traffic. It’s a near-monopoly with recurring revenue, and it subsidizes everything else SpaceX does. Without Starlink, SpaceX looks like a government contractor with amazing rocket technology. With it, SpaceX is an infrastructure company with a durable revenue base.

On the launch side, nobody is close. SpaceX’s reusable rocket economics give it a structural cost advantage that only widens with scale. The more they launch, the cheaper each launch gets, and the harder it becomes for competitors to close the gap. The moat is real.

What the IPO Actually Gave Them

This is the part of the story we think is most underappreciated.

Being public gives SpaceX something it never had as a private company: stock it can use to buy things. They wasted no time. Almost immediately after listing, SpaceX announced a $60 billion all-stock acquisition of Anysphere, the company behind the AI coding tool Cursor. They couldn’t do that as a private company.

Public equity turns SpaceX from a capital-constrained rocket and internet company into a platform that can acquire its way into AI, defense tech, communications, or whatever it wants, without spending a dollar of cash. The $2.65 trillion market cap isn’t just a number on a screen. It’s a war chest. Expect more acquisitions. This is an important consequence of the IPO.

It’s Expensive. That’s Not a Secret.

At $202 per share, SPCX trades at a triple-digit revenue multiple on roughly $22 to $24 billion in projected 2026 revenue. If you bought today, you’d be buying above where the Street thinks it should be. Michael Burry, to the surprise of few, has publicly said he’s tempted to short it. That doesn’t make him right, but it tells you something about the valuation.

That doesn’t mean it’s a bad investment. But it means the margin for error is thin. If Starlink subscriber growth slows, or if a competitor emerges in satellite internet, or if government contracts dry up, there isn’t much cushion in the price at these levels.

The Lockup Schedule and Why It Matters

As far as “wait-and-see” potential entries, consider the lockup schedule and when insiders and employees can sell shares.

When a company goes public, early investors and employees can’t immediately sell their holdings. They’re “locked up” for a set period, usually 90 to 180 days. The idea is to prevent a flood of selling right out of the gate. But when those restrictions lift, the new supply of shares hitting the market tends to push prices down. It happens reliably. Uber hit an all-time low on its lockup expiration day. Rivian dropped 20% in a single session when Ford started selling.

SpaceX didn’t use the typical single-date lockup. They set up a staggered release, so there are several dates between now and year-end where selling pressure could hit. Because of how SpaceX has done stock compensation, there are stories of cafeteria workers sitting on millions in equity. In our opinion, many of these individuals will be looking to cash in. Here’s the summary of the lockup schedule:

Late July/early August is the first real window. After SpaceX reports Q2 earnings, insiders can sell up to 20% of their locked shares. There’s a bonus tranche too: if the stock stays at least 30% above the $135 IPO price (so $175.50 or higher) for 5 of the 10 trading days heading into that earnings report, an additional 10% unlocks. Given where the stock is trading now, that threshold looks likely to be met, which means up to 30% of insider shares could come to market in one wave.

August through November brings a series of smaller releases. Additional 7% tranches unlock every two to four weeks. It’s designed to add liquidity gradually, but it’s still a steady drip of potential supply hitting the market through the fall.

After Q3 earnings, likely October, comes a larger release of roughly 28% of remaining locked shares. This could be the single biggest supply event before the final expiration.

December 8 is when the standard 180-day lockup fully expires. Everything except Musk’s personal shares becomes freely tradable.

June 2027 is the date for Musk himself. His 6.4 billion shares stay locked for a full year after the IPO.

Historically, the higher the speculative premium at IPO, the worse these dates tend to hit. Each one is a potential overhang worth watching.

The Other Risks

Musk holds super-voting Class B shares with 10 votes each, giving him effective control over the company. He can’t be removed as CEO without his own consent. This is the same governance structure that makes Tesla’s stock a roller coaster, and it means shareholders are along for the ride on whatever Musk decides to do next.

Government dependence has decreased but hasn’t disappeared. Starlink’s consumer and enterprise revenue has diversified the business, but defense contracts and NASA partnerships remain a meaningful share of income. Musk’s political profile adds a layer of unpredictability that cuts in both directions.

And Mars? It’s still a narrative, not a business. Deep space is decades away from generating revenue, if it ever does. The good news is the company doesn’t need Mars to work. Starlink and launch services can sustain SpaceX on their own. But some portion of the current valuation is built on that aspirational story, and aspirational stories are fragile.

Where We Stand

Starlink is a genuinely great business. It justifies a large valuation on its own. The launch monopoly adds to it. The ability to use public equity as currency for acquisitions opens an entirely new chapter. The question is whether $2.65 trillion, five days into trading, is the right price for all of that.

While it certainly could keep rocketing – obvious pun intended – our current assessment is not to rush.

The stock will be volatile. It has Musk’s name on it, and Tesla stock’s history has shown exactly what that means for price swings. The lockup calendar gives you at least four or five natural opportunities to reassess between now and December. If you believe in the long-term thesis, perhaps patience gets rewarded here.

How It Fits in Your Plan

This is where we step back from the SpaceX-specific analysis and talk about something more fundamental.

We’ve seen this pattern before. A generational company goes public, the excitement is justified, and people let that excitement override the plan they already had in place. They buy too much of a single name because the story feels too good to pass up. And for a while, that works. Until it doesn’t.

A sharp pullback in a stock like this isn’t a hypothetical. It’s practically a guarantee at some point, whether from a lockup wave, a broader market correction, a Musk headline, or something nobody sees coming. If SPCX makes up 3% to 5% of your portfolio and it drops 30%, that’s a bad day. If it makes up 20% or more, that’s the kind of drawdown that can derail retirement timelines, delay goals, and pressure you to sell at exactly the wrong moment.

The companies that inspire the most conviction are the ones most likely to become overconcentrated positions. That’s not a coincidence. The better the story, the harder it is to stay disciplined about sizing. But this is a speculative stock trading at a speculative valuation five days into its public life. The fundamentals are real. The price is not yet proven. There’s a difference between believing SpaceX will be one of the most important companies of the next decade and betting your financial plan on it.

If you want exposure, size it so a worst-case outcome doesn’t change your life, and stick to the financial plan we hope you built long before the SpaceX hype started. The best trade is always the one that lets you stay in the game.

Get The Latest Investment Insights Every Week

Industry news, insights, events, and resources — delivered straight to your inbox weekly.

By clicking Sign Up you're confirming that you agree with our Terms and Conditions.

Let’s Talk

Fill out the form and we will be in touch shortly.

Stay On The 'Inside Edge'

Stay On The 'Inside Edge'

Nick Silikov

Director of Communications
Nick brings over 15 years of experience working with leading companies in the trading and financial technology space. As Director of Communications at Inside Edge Capital, he helps clients navigate the firm’s services, while also managing and maintaining its suite of web properties.

Kyle Wasson, CFP®​

COO

As Head of Financial Planning and Chief Operating Officer at Inside Edge Capital, Kyle Wasson helps clients turn their financial goals into clear, actionable plans. A CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ (CFP®) with over a decade of experience as a wealth advisor, entrepreneur, and investor, he designs personalized strategies to grow wealth, plan for retirement, and build lasting legacies tailored to each client’s vision.

Kyle holds degrees in economics and financial planning from Texas Tech University, blending analytical depth with practical, real-world insight.

He lives in his hometown of Austin, TX with his wife Kat and their daughter, Alice.

Todd Gordon

Founder, CIO, CNBC Contributor

Todd Gordon is the Co-Founder and Director of Investments at Inside Edge Capital. He lives in Saratoga Springs, NY with wife Tricia, twin boys Jake and Brody, and their youngest Eden Rose.

He spent his youth leading an active lifestyle in upstate NY playing many sports, but excelling in alpine ski racing. His senior year he was one of the top ranked skiers in New York state. Todd’s love for the markets began at an early age. The day he turned 18 he was finally able to open his first E-trade account during the tech bubble of the late 90’s. Reading, studying, and following gurus on the internet he attempted to day trade via an AOL dial-up modem. It didn’t go so well, but he was hooked. Ask his parents about the first phone bill they received (they didn’t realize it was a long distance phone call to be connected to the internet).

Todd began college at St. Lawrence University in far upstate NY where he pursued a degree in economics, competed on their division-I alpine ski racing team, and continued to trade and study the markets. After a while Todd came to two realizations; first he was never going to be competitive at that elite level against future olympians, and second, he knew exactly where his career was headed, he was going to be a trader.

Opting to be financially prudent and reduce student loan burden, Todd transferred away from the expensive private school to the more reasonably priced U at Albany to continue studying economics. Todd will tell you he has not used his economics degree one single day in his 21-year career in the markets (he recommends psychology and history for aspiring traders / investors).

Following college he took his first job as a professional trader in San Diego, CA and eventually made his way back east to Forex.com / Gain Capital on Wall St in New York working as a Sr Technical Analyst and trader for the parent company’s hedge fund. The move was very timely as just a few years into his new role the global financial crisis started in 2007.

Todd made a name for himself on social media and his initial interviews on BNN and CNBC by successfully trading and navigating the extreme market volatility with full transparency and devotion to his readers.

With momentum behind him in 2011 Todd left the corporate world and ventured on his own to start his own research and trading advisory business named TradingAnalysis.com. TradingAnalysis still operates today led by an incredible team he’s built over the last decade that continues to serve active trading clients around the world.

Todd’s dream was to evolve from the education, research, and trading advisory model to a more intimate client-facing model of wealth management. In 2018, recognizing that the RIA / wealth management model was booming and headed online, Todd begged his beautiful wife Tricia to allow him to move the family away from New Jersey back to Saratoga Springs.

Todd has been a CNBC contributor since 2010 and continues to provide actionable, insightful, and light-hearted commentary for CNBC. He is known for blending technical and fundamental analysis to interpret the ever-changing market landscape to produce specific trading and investment ideas for CNBC viewers and his clients. He has appeared on various shows such as CNBC Fast Money Halftime show, Fast Money, Power Lunch, Squawk Alley, Squawk on the Street, Money in Motion, and the CNBC Stock Draft. He’s also appeared on Squawk Box multiple times, and also had the opportunity to sit in for Andrew Ross Sorkin as the host to conduct interviews.

Todd considers himself extremely lucky to have spent the past 2-decades in the financial markets and financial media doing a job he loves very much. He is very excited to enjoy the same success and satisfaction in the next evolution of his career with wealth management in the coming decades.